What do you think of OpenAI CEO Sam Altman stepping down from the committee responsible for reviewing the safety of models such as o1?

Last Updated: 01.07.2025 05:57

What do you think of OpenAI CEO Sam Altman stepping down from the committee responsible for reviewing the safety of models such as o1?

“[chain of thought is] a series of intermediate natural language reasoning steps that lead to the final output."

in the 2015 explanatory flowchart -

when I’m just looking for an overall,

Why do some men want to remain single despite the fact that many women want to have a romantic relationship with them?

“RAPID ADVANCES IN AI”

(according to a LLM chat bot query,

Damn.

The decades-long journey to Gilead’s twice-a-year HIV prevention drug lenacapavir - STAT

“Rapidly Advancing AI,”

within a day.

In two and a half years,

What is the best way to keep my vagina clean and fresh?

Let’s do a quick Google:

ONE AI

- further advancing the rapidly advancing … something.

Do you think the animation industry will make a breakthrough in creating new voice recordings of dead voice actors and celebrity actors through machine learning (AI)?

with each further dissection of dissected [former] Sam.

prompted with those terms and correlations),

“Rapidly Evolving Advances in AI”

How much can you sell a 10k subscriber newsletter for?

within a single context.

“EXPONENTIAL ADVANCEMENT IN AI,”

September, 2024 (OpenAI o1 Hype Pitch)

Why are so many US conservatives in this day and age still against racial mixing? They won't say it in public, but they are still against the mixing between Blacks and whites? Why?

(barely) one sentence,

“anthropomorphism loaded language”

January, 2022 (Google)

Oura Ring Can Now Use AI to Monitor Blood Sugar Levels. I Tested It For a Week and Got These 3 Surprising Takeaways - CNET

Nails

“Talking About Large Language Models,”

will be vivisection (live dissection) of Sam,

I think that being gay is wrong, but I treat gay people respectfully like any other person. Is it homophobic? Or offensive in any kind of way? Aren’t disagreement and discrimination two different things?

"a simple method called chain of thought prompting -- a series of intermediate reasoning steps -- improves performance on a range of arithmetic, commonsense, and symbolic reasoning tasks.”

“RAPIDLY ADVANCING AI”

DOING THE JOB OF FOUR

GIGABYTE refreshes RTX 5060 (Ti) EAGLE and WINDFORCE series with MAX variants featuring full-sized PCIe interface - VideoCardz.com

“Some people just don’t care.”

Eighth down (on Hit & Graze)

“[chain of thought] a series of intermediate natural language reasoning steps that lead to the final output."

Inside the Spectacular Downfall of UnitedHealth and Its CEO - WSJ

Further exponential advancement,

“Rapid Advances In AI,”

and

New Xbox Game Pass Day One Game Is Instantly a Huge Hit - ComicBook.com

Combining,

has “rapidly advanced,”

Is it better to use the terminology,

"[chain of thought] learns to break down tricky steps into simpler ones. It learns to try a different approach when the current one isn't working. This process dramatically improves the model's ability to reason."

Of course that was how the

An

guy

by use instances.

Function Described. January, 2022

Same Function Described. September, 2024

three, overly protracted, anthropomorphism-loaded language stuffed, gushingly exuberant, descriptive sentences.

It’s the same f*cking thing.

the description,

putting terms one way,

from

"[chain of thought means that it] learns to break down tricky steps into simpler ones. It learns to try a different approach when the current one isn't working. This process dramatically improves the model's ability to reason."

The dilemma:

describing the way terms were used in “Rapid Advances in AI,”

January 2023 (Google Rewrite v6)

increasing efficiency and productivity,

step was decided,

I may as well just quote … myself:

“anthropomorphically loaded language”?

to

better-accepted choice of terminology,

(the more accurate, but rarely used variant terminology),

or

Fifth down (on Full Hit)

of the same function,